Leveling the Playing Field: How CICA’s New Template is Changing the Crane Industry
At Level Playing Field Lawyers, we’re proud to announce a landmark collaboration with the Crane Industry
CLIENT
Residential Building Company (“Head Contractor”)
OTHER PARTY
Kitchen contractor (“Subcontractor”)
CONTRACT
Supply and install of kitchen and bathroom joinery
BREACH OF CONTRACT DAMAGES
$50,680.00 including GST
COURT ORDER
$50,680.00 including GST, Interest of $472.09 and Costs $1,769.50
The Subcontractor approached the Head Contractor claiming that it had successfully completed numerous kitchen and bathroom projects. It had one of its representatives explain in detail how the quality and timeframe could be adhered to.
The kitchen supply was delayed almost 2 months.
Once the kitchen and bathroom joinery did arrive onsite, it was apparent that there were numerous significant defects including chips, discolouration, doors being unable to be opened and missing joinery.
After 4 weeks of attempting to install the joinery, the kitchen contractor was unable to complete despite continued promises.
Under this contract, time is of the essence and LPF assisted the Head Contractor in legally terminating the contract. An independent building consultant was engaged to produce a detailed defects report.
A claim was made in the Magistrate’s Court against the Subcontractor and the directors personally. The claim was $50,680.00 for breach of contract and misleading and deceptive conduct. The Head Contractor obtained default judgment due to the Subcontractor’s failure to file a defence. The Subcontractor applied for a rehearing and the matter is now before the Magistrates’ Court.
RELATED POSTS
At Level Playing Field Lawyers, we’re proud to announce a landmark collaboration with the Crane Industry
If you’re a subcontractor working under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2002 (Vic) (the Act), it’s crucial to understand how to
Consider the effect of the recent decision in Plunkett v Portier Pacific [2024] VCAT 204. Facts The Respondent in this matter applied to have the
Case Summary: McDonald v MAK Constructions and Building Services Pty Ltd [2024] NSWCA 63 Background: In early 2022, a residential building contract between Ms. McDonald
Dispute about Dry Hire Agreement We acted for a crane company (Owner) that was engaged by another crane company (Hirer) under a dry hire arrangement.
KIND WORDS FROM OUR CLIENTS
17 & 18, 207 Buckley St
Essendon VIC 3040
© Copyright 2025 Level Playing Field Lawyers. All Rights Reserved.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.